Uncategorized


Yay! I plan to use my share of the returned tax dollars to buy a video game.

Well, more seriously, Darren Barefoot asked a serious question: he was wondering how Conservatives (which, rightly or wrongly, he seems to be imagining as opponents of the CBC in general.

Well, I guess I’ll do: pretty definitively conservative (both upper- and lowercase “C”), and I don’t think much of the CBC.

When I started to think about this note, I came up with the first three good Canadian TV shows I could. The list was Corner Gas, Trailer Park Boys, and HNIC.

The first two air on CTV and Showcase, respectively. The third consists of content by the NHL, Cherry and MacLean, and whatever standard-def cameras they deem Vancouver worthy of. If the whole thing was moved to TSN, the main change I’d expect is that on Saturday nights, I’d have half a chance of seeing the Canucks play in HD. I’m pretty sure Don Cherry will be on TV no matter whose tubes the NHL travels to get to my eyeballs.

Regarding the absurd arguments around “media concentration,” “lack of viewpoints,” “Foxification” or Clear-Channelization, I can say only this: when is the last time you watched a TV newscast? Except for Greek-language newscasts while at my in-laws, I can’t remember. Compared to the immediacy, diversity, accessibility, depth, and breadth of news from text-based sources (mainly but not exclusively online), The TV can’t compete with text, because I (and almost certainly you) can read faster than a reporter can speak. For those rare moments which are decisively visual, the web is pretty good at moving short video clips these days.

So the CBC’s entertainment shows are unmemorable, I don’t watch anybody’s TV news, it galls me that I’m paying taxes for this, and it has ads as well. What, exactly, is the argument in favour of CBC? What is the argument for the CBC that argues against a state-funded newspaper? As a marginal use of tax dollars, the output of the Corpse ranks somewhere between giving away Canadian flags and magazine subsidies.

I’d hesitantly concede that CBC Radio may be able to make a case for its existence, as a marginal-value proposition. It’s much cheaper than the TV network, and I am an audience of one who is personally highly susceptible to the charms of programming consisting of classical music and talk radio. It’s two of the three stations I’m most likely to listen to in the car (because I can’t safely read while driving). That’s not an argument for a subsidized radio network, it’s more an argument that CBC Radio is attractive to a certain set of middle-class aesthetes. Thus Canadian unity?

So here’s my deal for the CBC: give up on TV now, and you can keep the radio network and website until they start sucking.

Vuvuc the Cat
Vuvuc the Cat, on its window sill

Vuvuc began as a star-crossed Scrabble play, met us as a cat in the middle of its life, and died today after a sudden illness.

When we were both avidly playing Scrabble, The Lovely One, in a desperate end-of-rack fit, played “VUVUC” on the board and said if I challenged it, she’d use it as the name of our firstborn.

We took in a fluffy cat in need of a home not long after we married. And hey, we already had a name waiting for it!

Vuvuc spent a few years as an indoor/outdoor cat, twice getting itself badly hurt. After that, it was an indoor cat. Then it managed to get cat diabetes. For the last three years of its life, the cat peacefully endured twice-daily insulin injections. For my part, I manfully endured the occasional bite or scratch to tell me when I had injected it wrong.

Vuvuc had charming habits: if we were late to wake up, it would chew on toes, then foreheads, to ensure our vital feeding function was fulfilled. During a period which I refer to as “the war of the litterboxes,” Vuvuc managed to get us to send back three automatic litter boxes during the warranty period. After that, the warranty hadn’t run out, we just gave up on automatic litter boxes.

But the cat had a disposition sweeter than crab apple jelly, fur softer than lamb’s wool, and it purred at the slightest excuse. It spent much of its last 72 hours purring.

About a week ago, TLO noticed that Vuvuc had a slight tooth-chattering issue when it ate, and seemed to be having trouble with its dry cat food. We switched it to wet, and made a vet appointment for Monday. The cat had been losing a bit of weight in the last few months, but we assumed that meant we were on the right path with its diet; at seventeen pounds, it needed to lose a bit of weight.

By Monday, it was already obviously having a bit of real trouble, including trouble eating. The attending vet gave it an examination, and recommended a tooth cleaning, which required preliminary blood work, since tooth cleaning is done with the animal sedated.

I took the cat home. After a brief discussion, I brought the cat back in for the blood work that afternoon. It was already looking much worse: labored breathing, and now it couldn’t move its hindquarters well. They took the blood sample, and I took the cat home.

Tuesday, the cat was worse: by now it had stopped eating completely, its hind legs were hardly in action, and it could no longer climb into its own litter box (which was just as messy as you would imagine). Its breathing was audible at all times that it wasn’t purring. That evening the vet phoned us with the results from the blood work: not good. He wanted to see Vuvuc for an X-ray Wednesday morning.

The cat continued to get worse, and it was already at the point where “dead” was one of the few kinds of “worse” left. I was mildly surprised that it lived through the night.

I took the cat in for the X-ray, and Dr. Lam, the head vet, took a look. The cat was seriously ill; clearly worse during this appointment than previously. Before the cat went in, I asked what we would be learning from the X-ray.

And then it stopped. He showed me the blood results: there were indications of hyperthyroidism (probably the reason the cat was losing weight so easily), some sort of serious infection, early signs of liver shutdown, and anemia, which meant there was some sort of mystery blood loss. The list of blood test numbers in the normal range was far shorter than the list of numbers somewhere outside.

The first guess was a tumor. The blood loss could be explained by a ruptured tumor, which would now be the cause of the internal blood loss. The purpose of the X-ray was to find out where the tumor was. But the cat was now so weak that surviving any operation to excise a tumor was doubtful. After that, the hyperthyroidism would have to be chased down, and it was pure hope that the liver problems would go away after the tumor was out. The infection, presumably a side-effect of the tumor, could be fought with antibiotics. Meanwhile, something would have to be done about the failed hindquarters, which were likely the result of an errant blood clot. And the cat’s diabetes would complicate things further.

There was little left to do. We had the option of choosing a series of veterinary procedures which were likely to either kill the cat, interfere with each other, or leave the cat crucially debilitated, or possibly some series of those outcomes over several weeks. Or we could let go. The cat was in distress, and its chances of getting better were near zero; its chances of returning to anything like a normal existence were even smaller.

I called TLO, and then left the cat at the vet while I went to pick her up. We petted the cat, and Dr. Lam described Vuvuc’s situation to TLO. I signed the papers, and carried the cat into the surgery. TLO and I both petted the cat to the end.

Postscript from TLO:

Vuvuc, or “Wooly” as he was later nicknamed, was a wonderful cat. I’ve had many different cats from the time I was a child and I loved them all. However, Wooly was special. I’ll miss him lying on my laptop, sitting on the newspaper, clicking his tongue at the birds out the window and so much more. It was very sad when our cat was diagnosed with diabetes because it meant he could not go outside anymore – the risk of serious injury was too great. So, although our cat enjoyed its time inside the house, I thought I’d include an excerpt from a poem that sums up his happiest moments:

Orchard’s where I’d ruther be –
Needn’t fence it in for me! –
Jes’ the whole sky overhead,
And the whole airth underneath-
Sorto’ so’s a man kin breathe
Like he ort, and kindo’ has
Elbow room to keerlessly
Sprawl out len’thways on the grass
-“Knee-Deep in June” by James Whitcomb Riley

I only expected to do one of these things during my vacation…

Morning: have beloved cat put down, because it is suffering acutely and in manifold ways from what was most likely a burst tumor. The cat was pretty much normal-looking on Sunday. Here’s an irony: the cat has been an insulin-dependent diabetic for the last three years or so, and its blood-sugar level was about the only number in its blood work that wasn’t completely screwed up.

Afternoon: eat at A&W. Field offer from majorish motion picture to use the house as a shooting location.

Evening: make 48 jars of crab apple jelly. This takes about five and a half hours, and is roughly half of the jelly I plan to make this year.

More on this stuff later, I suspect. Except the A&W meal.

We interrupt our usual intermittent spurts of original content to link to something for you. It’s an interview with “Witesock,” a sports-sock collector.

Now that’s super. This guy has a wildly specialized collection of “several hundred” socks. He’s interviewed on the wonderfully obsessive Uni Watch blog. But that’s not the fun part…

UW: Now, do you wear these socks just for, y’know, walking around?

WS: I do. I wear them pretty much all the time.

UW: So are you wearing a pair of game-used socks right now?

WS: I’m wearing a pair of English rugby socks at the moment.

UW: Cool! There are so many people who collect things and then, either literally or figuratively, put them under glass — they squirrel them away, make sure not to touch them, and so on. But you actually use your collection. You wear your collection!

WS: I do, I like wearing the different socks. Maybe some of the extra-special ones I put aside and don’t wear. But most of the ones I get, I do enjoy wearing them.

But wait, there’s more:

UW: Yeah, that’s always the problem with having a really big collection. Now, I know, because you’ve told me in the past, that you’ve also gotten some attention from fetishist types.

WS: Yes, that’s probably the most common type of feedback I get, usually from people who want to see more pictures of me in socks.

UW: Are these men, women, or both?

WS: Primarily men.

UW: And is it your impression that word of your site has spread through the fetish community, like through internet message boards or whatever?

WS: I believe so, yeah.

UW: And how do you feel about that?

WS: It was a little bit unexpected, but I certainly don’t mind.

UW: And are you part of that community yourself?

WS: I’m not, no.

Which of course, inevitably leads to this:

WS: They want to see maybe a really beat-up pair of socks, things like that. I do maintain some anonymity — I won’t show my face, and I won’t show any other parts of my body. I do get those types of requests, but I don’t honor them. One of the most interesting requests I got was from a guy in Australia. He offered to send me five pairs of Australian rugby socks if I would take pictures of myself wearing the socks while at the same time throwing a pie in my face.
[…]
UW: So did you do it?

WS: I did, yes, I did. I actually had a lot of fun doing it.

This is, by the way, the collection that dare not speak its name:

UW: What do your friends and family think about your sock obsession?

WS: Oh, they don’t know!

And yes, he’s married. And yes, he’s Canadian. It goes without saying that he’s a Leafs fan. The rest of the interview. If you liked the excerpts, do read the rest. Witesock’s minimalist website. I in no way want to be Witesock. I’m not even very much interested in his site. But I love him just for existing.

I’m going to Barcamp Vancouver next weekend, and I need some advice on my presentation, if anyone cares to give it. The work in progress is exposed below.

“Ninety percent of everything is crud” – Sturgeon’s Revelation

With that principle in mind, I want to avoid burying all the things we hold dear (web 2.0, flickr, podcasting, bloggery, Darren Barefoot) just because 90% of them suck. If the suck rate was only 90%, we’d be doing great!

I want to get at the inherent flaws that are causing some of this stuff to achieve 3-5 nines of suck. Also, I should stop making up statistics.

“PowerPoint style routinely disrupts, dominates, and trivializes content.”
PowerPoint is Evil – Edward R. Tufte

I’m worried about technologies that lead smart people to stupid outcomes: Powerpoint can make your presentation worse. Chartjunk destroys your visual graphics.

But I’m seeing some dangerous stuff in the stuff bloggers like, too: podcasting is a medium for making commentary slower, unsearchable, and less interactive.

“I demand four minutes and twenty seconds of your life” (the single finest podcast I have heard, and the blog has the greatest slogan of any. Transcript).

The hazards of podcasting are manifest, and the solution is simple: beware the medium. A better solution is to confine it to those circumstances where it is well-warranted, and tightly constrained. Audioscapes? Yes. Your music? Of course. Interviews? Usually no, or only
with transcripts.

Tagging text fragments: I think you can trust search.

Google: innovation has ceased, let the moribundity begin! But like Microsoft, it will take rather longer for market dominance to cease. And Google has probably got a pretty good handle on what is about to become the next big thing: Web Services for Everything (all your Base are belong to Google).

videocasting: see podcasting, but with a higher bandwidth load. bloggingheads.tv is a major criminal here, along with Cringely’s half-brilliant Nerd TV.

Half-brilliant? He has wonderful interviews with interesting subjects.
The transcripts are great, and usable. The video, featuring nothing but
an hour of a barely-moving head, has been a waste of bandwidth. I
stopped downloading anything  but the 2-minute excerpts after episode
four.

Hopefully, the other 19 of you readers will find something to like, though.

First, Gord (who is faster than me) provides a wonderful account of his ride in the longest bike race in Canada. It sounds like a doozy of an event, and the tale is told well.

Second, having just recently yammered on about electric-assist bicycles and other light EVs, I saw this guy on my commute home:

The inventor/operator

He has built his own Stokemonkey-style electric-assist bicycle, and it looks like it works quite well: he passed me near Lougheed Mall as I was doing my 5 km/h recovery from an especially juicy sprint to beat the light, and when I saw the electric motor, I gave it everything to catch him.

view of the motor

Turns out the motor is typically used in electric wheelchairs (and occasionally in robot combat). The drive was to a freewheel cog mounted on the flip side of a flip-flop hub, something used on singlespeed/fixie bikes to allow a second gear option by removing the rear wheel and flipping it over.

closeup of drive train

I have a hundred pounds of crab apples in my in-laws’ freezer. I don’t see how this is likely to end well.

So, I thought I’d do one more post, a sort of redux of this whole deal whereby Matchstick arranged for Rogers and Nokia to give me a 6682. I’ve been using the thing as my main phone for a few months, and here’s what I think:

On one hand, the camera is not good enough, on the other hand, I’ve stopped carrying my doughty Nikon Coolpix 2500.

On another hand, the video part is even worse, but hey, on-bike interviews, dog versus Roomba, and Egg Ball Guy.

On one hand, I don’t like the camera’s UI much, but on the other hand, Series 60 applications, woo hoo.

On the gripping hand, giving me a phone which would work a lot better for me if I could use MMS to send pictures and video, and then charging dollars per photo on a typical data plan fills me with insane rage!

On one foot, the Mac integration is mediocre, which is not pleasing to me.

On the other foot, it’s still lots of fun to carry around. I probably wouldn’t buy one with my own money, but I didn’t have to, and at that price, it’s great! I probably would buy this phone with my own money (or even a better phone) if the data plan was within my budget. I’m willing to buy $300 nerd toys (hello, Roomba Discovery!) but I’m allergic to monthly charges, especially ones that threaten to cost more than any of my bicycles, each month.

Link-a-palooza:

I talk about pocketspace and the ups and downs of the 6682 and my plans for the phone.

Darren and Boris go nuts at Matchstick. The essence of my tawdry response can be heard in this podcast. Short summary: I can be bought. Travis has some sensible perspective. Non-sensible perspective is also available.

The story made the legitimate media.

I think now, except for more pictures and videos, I may be done. Maybe. Who knows?

Since riding for 80 km at an average of 30 km/h is not strenuous enough, I decided to ask my club mates a few stupid questions.

Featured riders: Gord (who is faster than me), Jason, Trevor, Al, Kenny, and Jeff, and that guy I missed. Dave?

Sure, it’s no dog chasing a robot vacuum, but you do what you can.

This video was all shot on Saturday, August 5, 2006.

A lot of things, including the recent release of Who Killed the Electric Car? [danger: mendacious revisionism, flash], the more constructive presentation of the Tesla Roadster (coming to a dealer not very near you in 2007, prices starting at US$80,000 for a machine that crosses a Lotus Elise with a lot of lithium-ion batteries), and this interesting article suggesting a way to make EVs practical for occasional long-range use.

If it’s not already obvious, I’m both very interested in EVs and very skeptical. It doesn’t take a conspiracy theory to explain the failure of the EV1: GM’s excuses are here, and they sound reasonable to me. Note when pages like this Wikipedia entry talk about ranges of “120 to 240 km” it’s almost always safe to assume that the shorter range will be closer to the truth. That these cars were probably costing GM about $40k each above their sale prices is just a sort of delicious frosting for this conspiracy cake.

To take my own driving as an example, I could usually get away with a 120 km car, but that would mean no round trips to Cultus Lake, no driving to Victoria via the ferry, et cetera. The real trouble with EVs comes when you run out of gas, because their refuelling times are measured in hours, and that’s if you can find a place to recharge.

I think EVs will get there. The best bet is that Li-ion technology, which is probably already good enough, will become cheap enough. $80k for a Tesla seems like a not bad deal in the boutique high-performance sports-toy car niche; as a marketing and development strategy, I think the cleverest thing about the Tesla is aiming at a bunch of car buyers who already expect a deeply compromised (minimal storage, no back seat) vehicle.

But here in BC, I think there’s some small opportunity, given local laws, to create two different, and very special types of EVs, both bicycles of a sort.

The first would be a bicycle, but a recumbent with a full fairing and an electric motor. This would be a bit of a cheater bike: the biggest flaw of electric bikes is that they’re pretty slow: restricted to 32 km/h on level ground by the local regulations (though I can’t tell from my reading of the law if that means it can go faster with electric assist as long as the rider is adding power on top of the electric power…) The biggest problems with fully faired recumbent bicycles (aka “human powered vehicles” (HPVs)) are their poor performance on hills and, relative to conventional bicycles, their clumsy low-speed maneuverability.

Assuming we just suck it up and live with the low-speed problem, an electric-assist HPV could be the best of both worlds: quick acceleration from the EV assist. Top speeds in excess of 50 km/h on level ground with a moderately fit rider (I’m thinking Supafamous-fit, not me-fit). Hill-climbing at 32 km/h up most hills. All of a sudden you have a vehicle that is pretty quick and capable on open roads. Not perfect for everything: downtown, I’d still take a straight bicycle, and it would be too slow for highways. But everything in between would be its oyster.

The second vehicle would be the same machine, but with all pretenses to human power thrown overboard. Then we’re dealing with an aerodynamic, light, and efficient motorcycle. Maybe even a scooter, performance-wise.

You could probably push to highway speeds in a pinch, you might be able to ride it with only a class 5 license if you could qualify it as a scooter, and the power and range should be acceptable considering the modest weight and high aero; it wouldn’t push battery technology to its limits. Compared to a scooter, it would probably be heavier, but vastly more aerodynamic.

Would I buy either vehicle? Probably not. My good-enough machine is a bicycle. I bought my current commute-to-work machine at a garage sale. $20 is a pretty hard price to beat. But I would very much like to try building the first of my two light electric toys. Anyone got an electric bike they want to donate to science?

Oh, while I’m throwing out irrational ideas like sparky sparks, how about a carbon fibre monocoque HPV for the road?

Back in the real world, this Stokemonkey thing seems like an especially clever variation on the cargo bicycle. The blog is worth reading, too.

Oh. And before I finished this post, Todd from Cleverchimp answered my idle email, and said one of his customers had used a Stokemonkey to implement pretty much my crazy idea. The thing is even a monocoque. Thanks, Todd!

« Previous PageNext Page »