Uncategorized


In a move that makes me seriously question their standards and judgment, the proprietors of Metroblogging Vancouver have invited me to post there. So I shall.

The effect on Wired Cola, the World’s Only Cybermorphic™ Weblog, should be that this becomes every more a collection of things that are stupid, personal, international, bicyclic, or some combination thereof. Anything I have that is local, regional, or interesting will probably go to feed the Metblog beast.

If you have something about Vancouver you want written up, let me know. My first two posts were a note that by-donation Thursday at the VAG is now by-donation Tuesday, and a reprise of my comparison of the free daily papers

We’ll see how it goes.

I hardly ever do a straight-up link, but this post on the Legal Rights of Photographers includes a PDF that concisely and precisely explains the (presumably American) law on taking candid pictures.

One thing I’ll have to do now is figure out if there are any significant divergences from what Mr. Kantor posted in Canadian law.

Now I can take a page from Andrew and start shooting some candid stuff. Take that, people daring to go out in public: You’re Flickr fodder now!

(þ: digg)

Yes, It’s true. like MTT motorcycle you can see that the engine is just a bit too big for a reasonable wheelbase, but would fit in a car.

Since that dream is crazy, I have downgraded this idea to using a turbocharged motorcycle engine in a similar vehicle. This was directly inspired by some discussions of exactly that idea with Derek Young a few years ago. The difference between myself and Derek is that he has the design and mechanical chops to pull something like this off.

Hey Derek: leave off the furniture. The world needs a 300-horsepower rwd original Mini.

Lacking anything especially special to say, recent pictures will have to do.
Silhouette
Originally uploaded by rcousine.

Christmas Lights
Since the days are long right now, I also seem to be taking a lot of pictures in the dark.

And since it’s Christmas, and I like cute things, here’s a cute Christmasy thing, taken in the dark:
Inflatable snowmen

I’m very bad at predictions. So much so, that stuff I keenly care about, I won’t discuss in this post. Which mostly means the current federal election, about which I care more than is warranted.

So, here’s some ludicrous guesses about the near-to-mid-term future, crossed with my mad prescriptions for the world.

China, bloody China: I remember when Japan was going to take over the world. Then the Yen rose, the banking system fell apart, and Japan became just another first-world nation, and not a very exciting one at that.

I think China is going to be a big deal for a long time, but I am optimistic that it’s going to continue to get more press than it really deserves for another decade or so. Then it will deserve the press. Unless, of course, India just overtakes it and leaves China in the dust, economically.

More specifically, I think one of two very important things will happen in China: either they’ll manage somehow to enact a functional democracy at the national level, or they’ll suffer the inherent corruption of totalitarianism, and get overtaken by the populous functional democracy on their western border. India. I mean India. If China does become a reasonably free democracy, then everybody wins, big time. I really believe that. It may be the most important political development of the next decade, either way.

But like I say, I’m betting on India as the quiet source of the greatest increase in personal prosperity over the next decade.

Africa, bloody Africa: In terms of relieving human suffering, I think donations to African-focused charities are where the marginal advantage is. But you can argue that that has been true for 50 years.

What may hopefully be different today is the possibility of some of our solutions being more effective than previous efforts at actually improving prosperity in Africa. We’ve already tried as-needed famine relief (largely redirected for political purposes) and mega-project funding like infrastructure, airports, and such (created useless infrastructure that mostly rots and has done nothing to improve the lives of rank-and-file Africans). The new, smaller-scale ideas (microloans, equity donations like The Heifer Project, etc.) seem more promising.

Unfortunately, Africa has two major, devastating problems which are dominating the continent: AIDS and lousy leadership. The latter ranges from occasionally insane leaders in relative non-disaster nation South Africa, to deeply insane lunatics like Mugabe in Zimbabwe, to the civil war in the Democratic Republic of Congo. It all sucks.

As for AIDS, the proximate solution is treatment, and that’s hard for a ton of reasons. I think the model for the continent should be Uganda, which has made a stronger commitment to abstinence education than any country on the contient, has seen its AIDS rates decline impressively, and has caused opponents of abstinence-first programs no end of trouble in their efforts to explain away the correlation.

I think there’s a shorthand way of expressing this: culture, in the long term, will matter more than medicine in reducing the incidence and effects of AIDS in Africa (and for that matter, in the rest of the world, too).

Nerdery: I love a great number of web applications. In no order, let’s go with flickr, gmail, and any old blogging system as my favourites, with digg as a pretty good new site. I don’t have any great sense of the future in this field right now, though I am personally interested in two subsections of technology: digital photography and high-definition TV. The major development in the latter is likely to be that 2006 will be the year people plug their HD sets into actual HD content. For digital cameras, I think I’ll call 2006 The Year of The Lenses: sensors are now the right combination of cheap and good such that the quality of the lens on a camera wil start to dominate both price and performance considerations at all levels of digital photography. This is another way of saying that the worst deal in digital cameras right now are the $100-200 super-cheap 3-5 megapixel cameras from off-brand makers. Most of these have horrible lenses, usually crappy primes, and sometimes they’re even “focus free.” Eek.

Enjoy your year.

Dog and Girl: technically a refutation of the no-human-models theory below, but The Lovely One was so sick at the time of shooting that she wasn't going anywhere, and couldn't object. Anything in the service of the art....I’ve briefly visited the question of what kinds of things digital photographers take pictures of in the past. A year and a half later, I’m ready to revisit that thought and why.

Avid digital photography resembles avid hobbyist film photography in many ways: I think both tend to attract fussy loners, and even darkroom insanity has its obvious parallels in post-capture image editing (only easier, faster, more powerful, and less messy). What I think digital photography has done is convert more people like me from casual shooters of family-gathering photos to obsessive shooters of grand masses of artistic photography. The default seems to be stuff that doesn’t move, and hopefully doesn’t involve a human model. Flowers, pets, architecture and landscapes, with a fair bit of close-up photography, too.

Conifer Close-upI don’t have anything deeply profound to say about this choice of subjects. The obvious reasons are that you don’t have to bore a human model with posing for you, and you can engage in the kind of instant-feedback iterative-adjustment shooting madness I praised previously.

Maybe it’s more interesting to talk about what we obsessive unprofessionals don’t take pictures of. The most obvious is candids of strangers. Why? If you’re me, it’s because you’re shy, and if I end up wanting to publish this photo, at best I feel bad about the nominal privacy violation, and at worst I fear getting sued (or just making an enemy). Overblown concerns, sure, but there are many other things to shoot. And by the way, that concern pretty much goes double for kids: the kid photos I and others take tend to go up either Friends-and-Family-Only on Flickr, or not at all.

Sheetmetal Workers' Rocket detailThere are a lot of amateur action photos out there (get your minds out of the gutter!), but I somehow don’t think of them as archetypal amateur subjects. My suspicion is that it’s one type of photography that really benefits from high-end equipment (long lenses, high sharpness, and no shutter lag).

Anything else missing from the canon of unprofessional photography? Nothing occurs right now, but I suspect one of you out there will remind me.

That’s about all I have for now. Merry Christmas eve, and I’ll figure out something more to say later.

So it’s been a weird few days, mostly because I’m taking care of The Lovely One, who has been all kinds of sick. Apparently one of her students gave her Martian Death Flu.

But life goes on, and I’m working on some projects. There’s a bike-related graphic design sideshow, A lot of photography, family parties, the ongoing bicyclic Cane Upgrade Program (update: fork and wheels acquired. Upgrade iminent), and random Christmas shoppery.

TLO doesn’t read this, so I can tell you: this year I’m reprising a trick I have pulled only once before: giving loosely thematic gifts for each of the 12 days of Christmas, one a day.

Two things: it’s a surprisingly elaborate project, and you are better off buying most of the gifts before Christmas Day rather than relying on post-Christmas shopping, because if you’re like me, those days will end up pretty frantic. The current score is 11/12, I think, and I have a pretty good idea what the twelfth gift will be.

Guys: if you want to impress a very special girl, this stunt is a great idea.

If you’re very good at cyclocross, you can win world cup races. If you’re very, very good at cyclocross, you can kick annoying fans on your way to victory. Seriously. I wouldn’t link to just any fan-kicking photo, you know: this one has amazing leg extension, and shows the bike-handling skills that mean Bart Wellens is sponsored, and I am trying to make a ‘cross bike out of stuff I found in my parts pile.

(þ: Cyclocosm and Pez)

If I was looking for a last-minute, under-$50, egregiously gadgety, but not entirely useless gift for someone, I’d probably pick up a Fossil Watch on eBay.

The going rate seems to be $20-30 for these things, plus the usual $15-odd shipping to civilization, slightly more to the hinterlands [insert “freak states” quote here]. For a functioning Palm PDA that fits on your wrist, that’s a reasonable deal.

I don’t get any kickback here, I’m just pointing out something fun. As always with eBay and inexpensive items, shipping costs can be a killer in the end; the shipping on these watches is more than the cost in some cases. Also note that UPS and FedEx can be exciting when used to ship from the US to Canada, for exorbitant brokerage-fee reasons. Don’t shop while drunk.


instalanche
Originally uploaded by rcousine.

Thanks to Sitemeter and a certain Mr. Reynolds, I got this little graph. It now appears that I will need to refer to you as all 40 of my readers instead of all 20.

« Previous PageNext Page »